Sunday, July 3, 2011

Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998

images Used Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Chrysler grand voyager le 25td
  • Chrysler grand voyager le 25td



  • praveenuppaluri
    08-12 02:33 PM
    people who already applied for GC (any EB) and are waiting, understand that you are lucky to cross that line.. in currrent economy, it doesn't matter if its EB2 or EB3, any job posting out there will get 100s of resumes and we are politely told to look for other options outside the country.. guess the below statement is true for everyone who needs to apply now..


    EB Guys, ..
    No green card for you. ... Do not hope for green card. H A V E F U N.





    wallpaper Chrysler grand voyager le 25td Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Used Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Used Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • ksrk
    08-11 02:41 PM
    There is nothing surprising about sept VB. Retrogression is here to stay unless any bill is passed. Please take note of the action item we have posted if we wish to see a change instead of waiting for VB and hoping for change.


    I agree with Pappu. This really doesn't mean much, at least nothing one can work through logically to understand how long it might take for one to get the GC, leave alone use it as basis to hope for one even if PD is current. This is as good/bad as the H1B lottery in April '06-'08.
    The only sustainable and meaningful relief lies in recapture and expansion of visa numbers, STEM exemption, etc. Let's work on buzzing in our congresspersons' years this August.





    Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. This manual covers all 1998
  • This manual covers all 1998



  • uma001
    08-12 02:04 PM
    Hydeboy is right.
    My american employer rejected to file PERM after ads are posted. They were supposed to befiling in EB3 and they said they found candidates so they are not going to file green card...I am totally depressed..This is the true picture in almost all american companies. BEWARE of green card.





    2011 Used Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. 1998,
  • 1998,



  • santb1975
    11-20 07:14 PM
    Let's keep moving forward :-)

    Thanks.Paypal worked for odd amount. eCheck Sent (ID #3LR82481PF164841Y)



    more...


    Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Chrysler Grand Voyager - 2007
  • Chrysler Grand Voyager - 2007



  • seekerofpeace
    08-13 09:51 PM
    Just goes to show how screwed up USCIS is......I have Zero expectations from them and should be able to control my emotions and balance of mind on anything relating to them.

    GC was a mirage and will remain one...

    SoP





    Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Used Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Used Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • akhilmahajan
    06-18 07:17 AM
    I have the same name issue. Will it be a problem at all?

    Please advise what should I do.

    Bumping up the tread.................. if someone can advice that will be great...............



    more...


    Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Usate Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Usate Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • saimrathi
    07-06 08:55 AM
    It would be great if DC area news agencies are given a headsup about this act of gratitude toward Emilio... It would be nice if we can get actual reaction from Emilio.. he'l probably think he's been punk'd..





    2010 This manual covers all 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Used Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Used Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • ngodisha
    12-20 03:48 PM
    Made another $100 contribution through Paypal.
    Transaction ID: 7RL94888U3632145P

    Those of you who have not contributed yet, please do so ASAP. Please contribute to this worthy cause.

    Nag



    more...


    Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • number30
    05-11 01:28 PM
    'end of discrimination based on country of birth i.e. .


    You can call this also as jealous. There are too many people from the other countries will have to wait because not having people to mass migrate to US. Arguments can be made in way. So be sympathetic. Your issue may not an issue for me. Do not call it as jealous

    What they are saying not jealous. According INA priority date in case substitution is the day I-140 is applied. Somehow the original labor date was assigned as priority date . This might be an error but is causing problems and Inconvenience and injustice to some innocent people. You can call it as jealousy. That is alright but they have an issue which they need to fight. However small number may be it can benefit these guys.
    If you do not support them that is OK. The moment you start using the word jealous, anti-immigrant etc. it stops the discussion.





    hair 1998, Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Used Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Used Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • anilsal
    09-07 11:21 PM
    this guy has openly challenged you. Are you going to just sleep through this? Not do anything on your part?

    Come on. Lets all go to DC to attend the rally in bigger numbers and show this tribiani dude, that we can gather for a cause.



    more...


    Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Used Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Used Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • vbkris77
    03-06 12:48 PM
    I am in.. Thanx for the initiative...





    hot Chrysler Grand Voyager - 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Used Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • Used Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • wandmaker
    08-26 02:27 PM
    The Receipt date is the date when they actually receive our case in a Service Center. Notice date is when it got entered into the system. I-485 Notice shows both the RD and ND. RD should be August 17 for most of us, whose cases were transferred to various Service Centers. Online status shows the ND. The only confusion here is what do they go by(may be USCIS it self not sure how to prioritize - whether on ND or RD).
    Strictly speaking, if they go by ND and if the ND is after Aug-17 we may not be eligible for GC, as our(July/Aug 07 batch) cut-off dates is august-17-2007. This is what I was told by DAO when I attended the interview at the local USCIS office.

    As mentioned earlier, USCIS suppose to process by the RD (ie. the date they received in the service center mail room) - but the fact is, they are going by the ND (i.e. the date they entered the case into the system).



    more...


    house 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. chrysler grand voyager side
  • chrysler grand voyager side



  • needhelp!
    11-16 11:01 AM
    Google Order #924728825007550





    tattoo Used Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. 1998 R CHRYSLER GRAND VOYAGER
  • 1998 R CHRYSLER GRAND VOYAGER



  • Pagal
    06-09 11:48 PM
    Go IV!!



    more...


    pictures Usate Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. 2000 Plymouth Grand Voyager
  • 2000 Plymouth Grand Voyager



  • vxg
    08-25 04:56 PM
    Me and my lawyer sent formal inquiry to TSC about receipt date of my case and TSC as insane they are stated they will use Oct 10, 2007 which is the ND. My app was shifted to VSC by TSC for data entry. I have a receipt from VSC showing RD of Aug 3rd, 2007 however TSC officer replied in email stating they do not go by the dates from VSC their date is Oct 10, 2007. Such an insanity where TSC sent my app to VSC for data entry and is not honoring the date VSC entered. My lawyer is sending a formal request to correct it. I have taken Infopass in Sept as well however i may miss the Sept boat because of this wrong RD this TSC is using. This may very well be the case with a lot of folks.





    dresses Used Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. chrysler grand voyager 2006
  • chrysler grand voyager 2006



  • qasleuth
    02-25 09:08 AM
    ALLOW EVERYONE TO FILE I485 SHOULD BE OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY.
    You people already have filed 485 and have EAD. EAD gives you so much freedom . It is as good as a green card.

    What about people who are less fortunate and cannot file II485. We need to allow everyone to be on the same page first and enjoy EAD freedom.

    That should be our priority before any country limits or this thread action item

    Please don't muck up this thread. Kate123/Jchan I think lead the effort of "Allowing everyone to file I485" but it ran into issues as it requires a change in law than an admin fix. No one is stopping you to pursue that option further.



    more...


    makeup 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager
  • 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager



  • hebbar77
    04-12 04:35 PM
    what do you mean by supporting IV?

    If you are talking about financial donations below model works best for me.

    lets say IV core comes up with COST of doing X,Y, Z fixes within XX weeks.
    COST is shared among wishing to donate. This becomes like a product purchase.

    Current model is not time bound nor result oriented.

    Again I am not anti-IV or anything. I am just expressing my idea!





    girlfriend 1998 R CHRYSLER GRAND VOYAGER Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. Chrysler grand voyager 5
  • Chrysler grand voyager 5



  • sam2006
    09-08 02:32 PM
    Guys lets just ignore the looser ( one of the 15% )
    he is just FINE ( Freaked out Insecure Neurotic Emotional) hanging around in IV

    no more replies





    hairstyles Used Chrysler Grand Voyager Chrysler Grand Voyager 1998. 1998 CHRYSLER Grand Voyager
  • 1998 CHRYSLER Grand Voyager



  • jamesbond007
    11-11 05:39 PM
    Go to the authorities and report her.
    H1 is a temporary situation. Your family is permanent. Protect your family.

    Do not let the fear of social services coming to check on you from stopping to do the right thing. They have a job to do; they will not take away a child unless they really believe that the child is not being cared for. They do not want to add to the strain of foster care system which is already under stress.

    Law enforcement agencies also monitor sites like IV, Rajiv Khanna etc. And they can get a subpoena against IV to get your information if they suspect that a crime has taken place.

    Everyone: please please ... You should not only check for the cleanliness and background of the staff (and facility) who take care of your kid. Also make sure that their way of taking care of your kid meets your expectation. Do not make any assumptions. Ask pointed questions and get certain answers.

    Also... I feel that there is more to the story than what the OP has said in his one and only posting.
    I think he/she already went past the point to think "what will happen to me" when they hired someone knowing that she was not legally eligible to work/provide that service.
    If not them reporting that nanny, her next victim will report her. I strongly believe that, if she is used to that way of raising a kid, she will hit other kids in the future. And they will be exposed at that point when the authorities grill her to spill the beans on her previous employers.

    I am also afraid that the OP might take matters into his/her own by making an emotional decision; and that would put him in hot water.

    chanduv: I read your post about how you hired a nanny based on your parent's monitoring her behaviour around your kid when they were visiting you. I hope that was not the only criteria for you to choose her. Keep in mind that a person's behaviour when they are alone speaks of their true nature. They can behave nice and good when they have company; but do they continue to be the same when there is no adult around them?
    Definitely install a nanny cam that you/yourwife can keep checking from work.

    Sorry if I sound like I am picking on you Chandu. But when I read your post, I felt that there might be other families who have done the same thing as you did.





    ameryki
    11-11 01:14 PM
    Hello guys,
    Sorry for this non-immigration related post. We have this sudden, tragic situation that I wanted all of your advice on. Thank you for your time in reading this long post.

    We had hired an Indian nanny in NJ who, we learnt after hiring her, is here on a tourist visa. We were paying her $350 per week cash, which is the standard rate around here for nannies (incl. citizens and people on GC). We had liked her when we met her in response to an ad on Sulekha, and we thought an Indian nanny would be good for our first child. She has been with us for about 3 months, and we were intermittently not getting a good feeling with her for some reason. We finally bought a small security camera and installed it yesterday. On the very first day with the camera, we came home and saw the recorded video to find that she is violently hitting the baby on two separate occasions. Needless to say, it has shocked, angered and extremely saddened us. I showed the video to a couple of friends and even they say it is unbearable to watch. This was just the first day of recording and it pains us tremendously to think what all may have happened previously.
    She is of course not going to stay with the baby alone anymore, but I want to know what legal options I have to penalize her to the fullest extent, so that she does not do this to anybody else�s small babies. She it seems had come here last year and taken care of someone else�s baby in Hoboken, and I can imagine that their baby also went through this. (This woman and her husband are a ~ 35 year old couple, who have a multiple entry ten year tourist visa; both come here for 6 months every year and work odd jobs like this. They apparently got a (unsponsored) tourist visa after showing a lot of landed property in India).
    I specifically want to know if I will have potential problems if I go to law enforcement about this- regarding have employed her (both of us are on H1B visas). I know we have made mistakes and should have done better due diligence in this, and there cannot be any more punishment for us than seeing our 8 month old � who cannot tell us about it when we come home- being beaten on the tapes. We saw this yesterday and have not told her yet. We want to weigh all options before we proceed, but from today onwards one of us is home all the time till Friday. Any advice or opinion is sincerely appreciated. Thanks for reading this long post. And, to all who are thinking of nannies or have one, please learn from our mistakes and closely monitor your child�s safety every day.

    As a parent of a 6 month old I can imagine what you are feeling. At the sametime given the circumstances I would not recommend you considering any legal action. Given the fact that you are aware that she is illegally working and that you were paying her cash weekly etc will only create trouble for you. I realize its hard for you to let this go considering its your own little baby but in the long run it will help you and your family. Kick the lady out of the house and tell her if you ever see her around your neighborhood you will have her arrested for assault.





    Madhuri
    03-06 03:41 PM
    I am in for $25



    No comments:

    Post a Comment